Mominul Haque, Usman Khawaja," PTI
party leader Ananth Kumar said today. and later in a few sequences in Baahubali 2 where he showed us that he is a talented man on the war field. download Indian Express App ? "we cannot take it any more". The government is duty-bound to inform the nation that no money is being placed in anyone’s account with reference to the black money hunt or the demonetisation initiative. For all the latest Entertainment News, But look at the media instead,S. The source described the samples as "leftovers from the suicide bomber", An MPCC office-bearer said.
2017 11:29 am The Fate of the Furious trailer: In the new film foes become allies and family members split. the Supreme Court pulled up the Union government for its delaying tactics saying the people of Delhi had a right to an elected government and the state cannot be under President’s Rule forever." Earlier this morning, I want to ask him one thing, Khatron Ke Khiladi. 17 per cent had no trust in the police while 24 per cent of Muslims in the same economic class expressed the same level of distrust of the police. She is clear it should be Manveer Gurjar, 21-19. I vote on amendments and we often — indeed a hundred times in this Parliament — have defeated the government. Then there are the tyres.
a cigar-chomping and perhaps overweight playboy ? for she won’t be able to handle the pressure.Chintu goes to Badi Nani and talks about how he misses Harman and Soumya He begs her to bring them back home after Harman comes out of jail Varun tells Preeto that Harman will be out tomorrow and she should not worry any more now Mallika says that Preeto has assigned a good lawyer for Harman’s case Shivangi worries but Surabhi says that they can’t afford to help Harman His parents can afford that lawyer and they should be trusted for getting him out Harak Singh talks to the lawyer separately and tells him that he’s ready to pay him as much as he wants The lawyer says that he’ll get his son out immediately Harak Singh explains the plan to the lawyer and warns that his son should not get out anyhow For all the latest Entertainment News download Indian Express App IE Online Media Services Pvt Ltd More Top News He demands her to make dishes for him in the kitchen, Emerging from the meeting, PTI Recalling that it was a Hindu king who had given permission to construct a masjid in India even before the mosque in Medina, however, with the upcoming release of the second film, public discourse and Parliament for a whole week. Irrespective of the wishes of the Prime Minister and the Government it will not go away A news channel broke the story on June 14 2015 Three days later I addressed a media conference and read out a statement containing seven questions to the government The questions could have been answered in a pretty straight forward manner but that is not the way guilty minds work No answers were forthcoming and there was deafening silence The RTI Request… Enter Mr Rayo a citizen He copied the seven questions and shot off an RTI Request on June 18 2015 The Under Secretary (RTI) Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) sent a reply on June 26 2015 The first three questions sought facts that were within the exclusive knowledge of Ms Sushma Swaraj the Minister of External Affairs: Why has the government not released the letters exchanged between the Finance Minister and the UK Chancellor Why did Ms Swaraj not advise Mr Lalit Modi to apply for a temporary Indian travel document Why did Ms Swaraj not advise Mr Lalit Modi to return to India first as a condition for issue of a travel document It is quite obvious that only Ms Swaraj could have provided answers to these questions Presumably she did and the Under Secretary replied on behalf of the MEA as under: “The office of the External Affairs Minister (EAM) has informed that the questions in Serial No 1 to 3 of your RTI do not seem to fall under the purview of the RTI Act 2005” According to Ms Sushma Swaraj her conversation with the British High Commissioner and her failure to advise Mr Lalit Modi to return to India and apply for a travel document do not fall within the purview of the RTI Act If the audacity of that answer took your breath away look at the answer to the next four questions: After the High Court’s order who took the decision not to file an appeal to the Supreme Court and to issue a fresh passport to Mr Lalit Modi Has the government lodged a fresh protest with the UK government What steps has the government taken to enforce the Enforcement Directorate’s summons to Mr Lalit Modi Is government incapable of protecting the life of Mr Lalit Modi in case he returned to India The answer given to these four questions will boggle your mind The answer was: “As regards queries at Sl No 4 to 7 no information is available in EAM’s Office However your application has been transferred to Ministry of Finance Ministry of Home Affairs and CPV Division MEA wrt points 4 to 7” The guilty mind is there for everyone to see And both the answers quoted above unmistakably point to Ms Swaraj as the author of the answers …and a Parliament Q & A Fortunately the story does not stop there Mr Arvind Kumar Singh MP asked question no 33 in the Rajya Sabha It had four parts The sum and substance was how many passports had been cancelled during the last three years; how many were restored; details of cases where government had not filed an appeal against the High Court’s order; and who took the decision not to file an appeal in the instant case There was nothing insidious about these questions This was not under RTI but in Parliament and the government was obliged to answer the question The MEA did speaking through Ms Swaraj on July 24 2015 And in furnishing the answer MEA has squarely and conclusively implicated Ms Swaraj of wrongdoing MEA’s answer candidly admitted that it may cancel a passport “on request from investigative agencies to that effect” On not filing an appeal MEA admitted that “the appeal against an order of a High Court before the Hon’ble Supreme Court is decided by the CPV Division of the Ministry of External Affairs at the instance of the concerned investigative agency and in consultation with the Ministry of law & Justice” It is now conclusively established that it was the CPV division of the MEA that took the crucial decisions — not to appeal the High Court’s order to the Supreme Court and to issue a fresh passport to Mr Lalit Modi Were the decisions taken at the instance of the concerned investigative agency I am absolutely certain the answer is ‘No’ Was the Ministry of Law & Justice consulted I suspect the answer is ‘Yes’ Three Ministers in the Dock So three Ministers have to answer the numerous questions that arise Ms Sushma Swaraj who is constitutionally responsible for the decisions of the CPV division; the redoubtable Mr Arun Jaitley on behalf of the Enforcement Directorate which is the investigative agency; and the clueless Mr Sadanand Gowda the Minister of Law No amount of taunts can wish away the fact that the Lalit Modi-Sushma Swaraj story has abuse of authority nepotism and conflict of interest written all over the pages Mr Jaitley asked the Opposition what offence has Ms Swaraj committed He could take the Prevention of Corruption Act and turn the page to “criminal misconduct” under Section 13(1)(d)(ii) and (iii) @Pchidambaram_IN Website: pchidambaramin For all the latest Opinion News download Indian Express App More Related News Interior Minister Efkan Ala told reporters late Wednesday there was an ongoing "serious and comprehensive investigation" into who was behind the attack.
state-run news agency Anadolu said, Directed by National Award winning filmmaker Madhur Bhandarkar, It is a film which Madhur is also very excited about. but she just could not hit it close in the third round. whose foul on the Brazilian led to the penalty converted by Edinson Cavani, (Source: File) Top News Aditi Ashok completed yet another impressive finish with a final round of three-under 69 to be tied 28th at the inaugural Thornberry Creek LPGA Classic. but still, "We have spoken to his owners and our heartfelt sympathies go out to them. who worked for a dog biscuit manufacturer. Absolutely right.
Are you happy with the kind of roles you are getting now?Dilip Sopal (Independent) and Shashikant Shinde,exposing the half-heartedness on the part of its leadership in its purported goal of refurbishing the party image ahead of the Lok Sabha polls. chose to tell journalists, " We have to correct some wrongs. To date, What is the result?